| Number 320 of 329 messages in this Archive | ||
|---|---|---|
| [Date Prev] | Main Index | [Date Next] |
| [Thread Prev] | Thread Index | [Thread Next] |
|
It makes a
certain degree of sense in a way.
If you give foot infantry light
motor vehicles they become motorised so if you give armour light motor
vehicles they become motorised too since they're no longer armoured (in the real
sense - kevlar isn't armour against what tanks chuck at each other, it's just
less thin toilet paper).
If it isn't infantry, armour or
artillery it must be "motorised" which I believe has been long been a catch-all
definition for almost any vehicle that wasn't armed with heavy direct fire
weapons. I'm sure I've seen WW1 photos of infantry on "motorbikes" classed
as motorised.
Like the
quote below says though, you are whatever your senior officer says you
are. Just pray he doesn't suddenly start calling you "motorised parachute
marines". I wouldn't like to jump out of a perfectly healthy plane in a 5
ton lorry!
QUOTE
|
_______________________________________________ Gzg-l mailing list Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l