GZG List archives -- November 2005

Number 320 of 329 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault



It makes a certain degree of sense in a way.
 
If you give foot infantry light motor vehicles they become motorised so if you give armour light motor vehicles they become motorised too since they're no longer armoured (in the real sense - kevlar isn't armour against what tanks chuck at each other, it's just less thin toilet paper).
 
If it isn't infantry, armour or artillery it must be "motorised" which I believe has been long been a catch-all definition for almost any vehicle that wasn't armed with heavy direct fire weapons.  I'm sure I've seen WW1 photos of infantry on "motorbikes" classed as motorised.
 
Like the quote below says though, you are whatever your senior officer says you are.  Just pray he doesn't suddenly start calling you "motorised parachute marines".  I wouldn't like to jump out of a perfectly healthy plane in a 5 ton lorry!
 
 
QUOTE
If the officer says it's a "motorized tank platoon" then it's a "motorized tank platoon."
 
Gracias,

Glenn "warbeads"

 

UNQUOTE

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] OT: 25 MM Vehicle Size Comparisons
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Dec 22 13:19:20 GMT 2005