Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault

[Warbeads@xxxxxxx]

In a message dated 11/29/05 8:45:28 AM Central Standard Time, roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 06:28:05AM -0800, laserlight wrote:

>"Motorized tank" doesn't make sense; perhaps "motorized
>armored platoon" is what they meant.

As with the Royal Navy's term "Warfare Officer", even though one knows
the reason for the specific use of language one does still tend to
wonder what a non-motorised armoured platoon would look like.

R
_______________________________________________
<snip>

Pill boxes?

 

Gracias,

Glenn "warbeads"

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l