GZG List archives -- November 2005

Number 271 of 329 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault



Glenn wrote:

Oerjan Ariander wrote:

> You were talking about ARMOURED support above. Generally speaking,
> trucks and helos aren't considered to be "armoured support" - although
> I've noticed that the US Army now calls a platoon of 4xM1114 armoured
> HumVees a "motorized tank platoon", so maybe the requirements to count
> as "armoured" are being softened nowadays <g>

<snip>

I would like to see your source for this comment. Not that I doubt you as to it be said I just...doubt the source's IQ.

My source: several articles in Armor Magazine over the past year, mostly ones where "motorized tank" units in Iraq describe how they re-organized to make the best out of limited assets


(BTW Glenn, your posts are *heavily* formatted. Please re-set to "plain text" if at all possible!)

Regards,

Oerjan
oerjan.ariander@xxxxxxxxx

"Life is like a sewer.
 What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: RE: Re: [GZG] A planetary assault as a wargames campaign - Kra'Vak
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Dec 22 13:19:20 GMT 2005