GZG List archives -- November 2005

Number 264 of 329 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault



On 11/28/05, Warbeads@xxxxxxx <Warbeads@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > You were talking about ARMOURED support above. Generally speaking,
> > trucks and helos aren't considered to be "armoured support" - although
> > I've noticed that the US Army now calls a platoon of 4xM1114 armoured
> > HumVees a "motorized tank platoon", so maybe the requirements to count
> > as "armoured" are being softened nowadays <g>
>
> <snip>
> I would like to see your source for this comment.  Not that I doubt you as
> to it be said I just...doubt the source's IQ.

My Source:

Mission Readiness Exercise conducted Sep-Oct '05, at the Joint
Multinational Readiness Center, Hohenfehls, Germany.  My company was
attached to TF Bandit, built around 1-37 AR +/-

We even got a 'dual purpose' platoon (M-1114s and M-1s) cross-attached to us.

John
--
"Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again
and again.  We're looking for thousands of Persians."
--Vita Aureliani

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] A planetary assault as a wargames campaign
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: [GZG] A planetary assault as a wargames campaign - Kra'Vak

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Dec 22 13:19:20 GMT 2005