Re: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault

[Doug Evans <devans@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Good point!

I know I was thinking fairly advanced colonies would tend to have most
manufacturing facilities, relatively automated, close to the 'band'.
Settlements would be close, but not integrated. Likewise, I assumed the
colonies were mostly self-supporting, that the amount of goods going out
and coming in relatively small.

Lastly, I thought the band was for approach, while the ports themselves
closer to the edges.

I'll have to admit it was not fully formed in my mind. Vague, actually.
I'll chew on it some more.

The_Beast

John Atkinson wrote on 11/24/2005 10:02:56 AM:

> On 11/24/05, Doug Evans <devans@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Winchell, the few attempts at populating the world map
> had an undeveloped
> > equatorial strip, that was assumed left for safe 'landing'.
>
> How far from the equatorial strip to the main settlements?  I have
> presumed that, as is the case with sea ports, star ports would be
> within easy reach of major population centers.  For
> economic reasons.
> It's hard to move goods thousands of Ks to a population
> center to sell
> them.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l