GZG List archives -- November 2005

Number 219 of 329 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault




John Tailby wrote on 11/23/2005 06:19:44 PM:

> When I made my comments about equatorial landing zones I
> made the assumption that the landing craft would be a more
> advanced version of the space shuttle. If the landing
> craft have full antigrav then they could land straight down.

The planet assault campaign map I showed Nyrath was a series of orbits,
with the closest, 'insertion' circle as geosync, and was over the equator.
I did this to simplify game mechanics, but PS(ocialogical)B'd it as strict
operational ROE's(more appropriate term?). Approaching combatant craft,
though I assumed all space vehicles for safety issues, were required to
maintain equitorial orbits to reduce collateral damage.

Nicely, this gave me a two dimensional map. ;->=

Note, this was assumed to be within the Tufflyverse implied stepped level
of violence; core worlds, no war, inner colonies for the map above,
'gentlemen's conflicts', and outer colonies, 'wild west'.

Winchell, the few attempts at populating the world map had an undeveloped
equatorial strip, that was assumed left for safe 'landing'.

The_Beast

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: RE: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Dec 22 13:19:19 GMT 2005