GZG List archives -- October 2005

Number 437 of 620 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: Statistics - was RE: [GZG] Re: laser classes



You know, I'll admit I gave up before, but let me try this.

With two dice, you have better chance of starting that string of sixes; not
HUGELY better, but better.

Does that work? It's what I was saying before, but I let it get clouded in
the smaller case of boxcars.

So, the chance for the first six is not one in six, but eleven in
thirty-six, not quite one in three. One of those eleven is the boxcar case,
so that in the one in thirty-six total, and in eleven of at least one six
rolled, chance, the next roll of two dice is not quite one in three. I
think calculus is needed, as this seems to be approaching a limit of
doubling your chances.

Ok, it doesn't require calc, but I don't want to work it out. ;->=

The_Beast

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: RE: Statistics - was RE: [GZG] Re: laser classes
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Diceless?

  • Previous by thread: RE: Statistics - was RE: [GZG] Re: laser classes
  • Next by thread: RE: Statistics - was RE: [GZG] Re: laser classes

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Tue Nov 01 02:07:50 GMT 2005