Re: [GZG] More beta ships

[Doug Evans <devans@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ok, not necessary for the ships, but, with the Fleet Books as the paradigm,
the romanized form of the original language for fleet designations just
seemed the way to go.

Fiddly-r-us. *ducking pending lawsuit*

The_Beast

> ***
> Beast wrote:
> Would Imperial Spaceforcenavy Ship produce an acronym that would
> offend?  ...Ship of the Imperial Spaceforcenavy?
> ***
>
> Why not just call it ISS for Imperial StarShip? Makes
> sense to me. and IMS for Imperial Merchant Ship. KISS principle.
>
> Ken

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l