GZG List archives -- September 2005

Number 204 of 278 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Beta Playtest Rules



Claus Paludan wrote:

* All players thought that one side had won the battle hands down, when in fact both sides had lost almost exactly the same percentage of their hull/armour boxes; but while one side had lost several ships and had the rest untouched the other had taken some damage to all units, so one side *seemed* to be in far worse shape than the other;

Well - one could argue that the side with damaged ships were better off than the one with lost ships.. Damaged ship might shoot back, might accomplish mission tasks and might get away etc... Destroyed ships don't ;)

One could just as easily argue that due to the way Full Thrust's damage system works the damaged ships will almost certainly lose their remaining weapons faster, and also die faster, when they take further damage than similarly-sized undamaged ships will.


In addition, Full Thrust's initiative system means that the fewer undamaged ships get to fire before all of the more numerous damaged ships have fired, thus further improving the undamaged ships' chances of knocking out weapons on the damaged ships before the latter can fire their weapons :-)

Regards,

Oerjan
oerjan.ariander@xxxxxxxxx

"Life is like a sewer.
 What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] Beta Playtest Rules
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Re: Carrying Figures and better beta battle reports

  • Previous by thread: Re: [FT] Intact/Destroyed vs All Damaged [GZG] Beta Playtest Rules
  • Next by thread: RE: [GZG] Beta Playtest Rules

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Oct 01 01:07:37 GMT 2005