GZG List archives -- September 2005

Number 177 of 278 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Beta Playtest Rules




Oerjan Ariander wrote:
* All players thought that one side had won the battle hands down, when in fact both sides had lost almost exactly the same percentage of their hull/armour boxes; but while one side had lost several ships and had the rest untouched the other had taken some damage to all units, so one side *seemed* to be in far worse shape than the other;

Well - one could argue that the side with damaged ships were better off than the one with lost ships.. Damaged ship might shoot back, might accomplish mission tasks and might get away etc... Destroyed ships don't ;)


--
With kind regards
Claus Paludan

W-site : http://www.krigsspil.dk - Danish Miniature Wargaming Society
MSN : claus_paludan [at] hotmail.com

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] Beta Playtest Rules
  • Next by Date: RE: [GZG] Beta Playtest Rules

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Beta Playtest Rules
  • Next by thread: Re: [FT] Intact/Destroyed vs All Damaged [GZG] Beta Playtest Rules

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Oct 01 01:07:37 GMT 2005