GZG List archives -- September 2005

Number 51 of 278 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Battlereport from August 31, 2005



An update from the Kra'vak side:
http://www.twins4ever.dk/cougarscorner/index.php?showtopic=139&st=0&#entry332


@Gregory - I don't think there is much to add to this scenario - it was only a test of ship capabilites - why we wrote up a whole scenario for it..?? Well that's just us.. Don't put too much into it.. try it out (only takes 4-5 turns lol) if you like, but better and real scenarios will turn up later :)


@Oerjan - don't go too deep into the weapon statistics - it doesn't really matter for us. We have played 3 games now with the Kra'vak - the first one pretty equal (same size of fleets, almost same type of ships) and that evened out ok. The second and third game had quite another objective (testing rather than gaming) in order for us to assess the ability of a dreadnought. We will fiddle and tamper with the support for it later on as well as switch sides (could be that my beams would be a turn or two longer in destroying the Kra'vak SDN). As to judge whether some weapons are more powerful than others, ship designs better than others and stuff like that.. well we have played far too few games to judge that, and even if we had played a lot more it still wouldn't matter - we are not aiming for strictly balanced games - just fun. And even though the dreadnought was wiped out fast we still had fun both games.. and we probably would make the same type of unbalanced game later on - just to have fun..

We have played a lot of WW2 on the eastern front (both early and late) and we are quite used to more powerful weapons/commanders or what ever on one side - that's the way it was then, that's how it is if you play other battles as well - rarely do you have equal forces on both sides..

So sit back and relax, read our reports if you like, don't read them if you don't feel like it.. The endeavours of Vladimir will continue (he probably WILL survive each battle in a true Honor Harrington/Horation Hornblower way while we try all sorts of battles and setups..

Don't take it too serious nor dwelve too much on our findings regarding weapons :) Statistics won't work on me anyway... I played WH40K when I started, never won a single battle bar one, many, many of those battles were most likely lost due to really bad dice rolls. My opponent who was working every day with statistics stopped wondering about my continous bad dice rolls in the end - he just accepted it in the end :) But we had fun all the way - the most important part :)

Stay cool and may the FTL be with you all. (if you paid the points and mass for it that is :D )


-- With kind regards Claus Paludan

W-site : http://www.krigsspil.dk - Danish Miniature Wargaming Society
MSN : claus_paludan [at] hotmail.com

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: RE: [GZG] Help with scaling on Heavy Gear Minis (second trywithoutthe cruddy stationary)
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Help with scaling on Heavy Gear Minis (second trywithoutthe cruddy stationary)

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Battlereport from August 31, 2005
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Battlereport from August 31, 2005

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Oct 01 01:07:36 GMT 2005