GZG List archives -- August 2005

Number 18 of 300 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] [DSII] Precision Strike



>>No, they don't (not if you're serious about the "120mu range" bit,
>> anyway). There are several "MADS equivalent" systems today which have all
>> systems collected on a single vehicle. They *can* be split up into
>> multiple units, but they don't *have* to be.
>
> They tend to require multiple units, however aren't those more in the
> range of being covered by the ZAD systems? Given that the method of fire
> is a bit abstracted (ground fire allowed, etc).

The examples that I can think of are either single vehicle based (rapier,
crotale, etc), OR are split up to seperate C&C/launcher control from
things that draw fire (e.g. radar systems, launchers) (e.g. flycatcher
Mk2)

Cheers,

   Derk

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] [DSII] Precision Strike
  • Next by Date: Re: Req for examples Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] GZG SUMMER SALE OFFERS!

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] [DSII] Precision Strike
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] [DSII] Precision Strike

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Sep 01 01:07:35 GMT 2005