GZG List archives -- March 2004

Number 837 of 940 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: [SGII] Nasty Cover




--- "Robertson, Brendan"
<Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au> wrote:
> The last game that I saw this occur in, wiped out
> the squad in the building
> from one IAVR shot.

Sounds about right.

Can we say "Antiarmor weapons make short work of
drywall?"

I knew we could.  

Keep in mind, light antiarmor weapons are not intended
to kill tanks (excepting rear shots or flank shots on
crap tanks) but light armor.  And that's a reasonable
description of most buildings.  Packaging your
infantry in a box for easy and convenient killing is a
bad idea[1] whether that box is on treads or a
foundation.

John

[1]As with all tactical generalizations, YMMV, METT-T Dependant.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html




  • Prev by Date: [FH] Military ranks
  • Next by Date: Re: [FH] Military ranks

  • Previous by thread: RE: [SGII] Nasty Cover
  • Next by thread: RE: [SGII] Nasty Cover

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Apr 01 01:09:07 GMT 2004