GZG List archives -- March 2004

Number 663 of 940 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: DSII armor question...



Well, I wouldn't call it "armor 1 all around" because clearly, it is not.
That is, in DSII a valid "0" chit will damage it.

However, that does not answer the question of what happens with infantry
weapons or APSWs.  My take would be that it is counted as "armored"
against small arms, but is way easy to kill with vehicle killing weapons.

I'd love to see some kind of official ruling though. :)

J


John K. Lerchey
Computer and Network Security Coordinator
Computing Services
Carnegie Mellon University


On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Nicholas Caldwell wrote:

>
> I've wondered about this one myself.  We always counted it as being 1 armor all around.
>
> nick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John K Lerchey <lerchey@andrew.cmu.edu>
> Sent: Mar 18, 2004 1:17 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: DSII armor question...
>
> I read the FAQ, and did check the rules, but did not find an answer.
>
> So, let's say I have a recon vehicle of size 1.  It's 1 armor on the
> front, and thus, 0 on the sides, top, and bottom.  It's not "open topped",
> it's just small.
>
> Is 0 armor on the non-front facing considered to be the same as a
> softskin?  Or, in other words, can the vehicle be successfully engaged
> by small arms or APSW fire?
>
> Thanks,
>
> J
>
>
> John K. Lerchey
> Computer and Network Security Coordinator
> Computing Services
> Carnegie Mellon University
>
>
>
>




  • Prev by Date: Re: DSII armor question...
  • Next by Date: Re: DSII armor question...

  • Previous by thread: Re: DSII armor question...
  • Next by thread: Re: DSII armor question...

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Apr 01 01:09:05 GMT 2004