GZG List archives -- March 2004

Number 605 of 940 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Graser beam observations



Jared Hilal wrote:

>Yeah, I have worked out the statistical average numbers myself.
>However, I am not talking about theoretical averages, but rather about
>our empirical results acquired  repeatedly and consistently over many
>games.


Strangely enough, in our group the opposite is true. On the whole the guys
found pulse torps more effective than beams. So much so that for a couple of
years no design used a beam larger than class2, and no-one used screens.
Fortunately that has all changed over the last year or so but Pulse torps
are still the weapon of choice amongst my colleagues.  I would have to say
the results from our battles match the stats quoted by Oerjan and everyone
else. However, if that doesn't tally with your observations then fair
enough.

Regards,

Matt Tope






  • Prev by Date: Re: FT fire arcs
  • Next by Date: Re: Graser beam observations

  • Previous by thread: Re: Graser beam observations
  • Next by thread: Re: Graser beam observations

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Apr 01 01:09:05 GMT 2004