GZG List archives -- March 2004

Number 600 of 940 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: Graser beam observations



Using those figures (and ignoring the extra 6" of range) we can make some
variable comparisons.
This is rough and doesn't take into account all the variables that OO plugs
into his math.

Damage per mass (6-arc comparison):
			B-1 (6 arc)  	Graser-1 (6 arc)
Pulsetorp (2 x 3-arc)
12 mu vs Screen 0	0.8015		0.6987			0.3889
12 mu vs Screen 1	0.6362		0.5525			0.3889
12 mu vs Screen 2	0.4679		0.4083			0.3889

Damage per mass (1-arc comparison):
			B-3 (1 arc)	Graser-2 (1 arc)
Pulsetorp (1-arc)
06 mu vs Screen 0	0.6011		0.6213			0.7292
12 mu vs Screen 0	0.6011		0.6213			0.5833
18 mu vs Screen 0	0.4008		0.6213			0.4375
24 mu vs Screen 0	0.4008		0.3107			0.2917
30 mu vs Screen 0	0.2004		0.3107			0.1458
36 mu vs Screen 0	0.2004		0.3107			n/a

06 mu vs Screen 1	0.4771		0.4911			0.7292
12 mu vs Screen 1	0.4771		0.4911			0.5833
18 mu vs Screen 1	0.3181		0.4911			0.4375
24 mu vs Screen 1	0.3181		0.2455			0.2917
30 mu vs Screen 1	0.1591		0.2455			0.1458
36 ms vs Screen 1	0.1591		0.2455			n/a

06 mu vs Screen 2	0.3509		0.3629			0.7292
12 mu vs Screen 2	0.3509		0.3629			0.5833
18 mu vs Screen 2	0.2340		0.3629			0.4375
24 mu vs Screen 2	0.2340		0.1815			0.2917
30 mu vs Screen 2	0.1170		0.1815			0.1458
36 mu vs Screen 2	0.1170		0.1815			n/a

Brendan
'Neath Southern 



> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Jon Davis [SMTP:davisje@nycap.rr.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, March 17, 2004 11:57 AM
> 
> Beam 1 vs. Screen-0    Graser 1 vs. Screen-0
> Average = 0.801545     Average = 2.79584
> Max     = 14           Max     = 56
> 
> Beam 1 vs. Screen-1    Graser 1 vs. Screen-1
> Average = 0.63616      Average = 2.209875
> Max     = 12           Max     = 54
> 
> Beam 1 vs. Screen-2    Graser 1 vs. Screen-2
> Average = 0.467905     Average = 1.633
> Max     = 12           Max     = 47
> 
> 
> Mass 1 - All arcs      Mass 2 - Single arc
> 
> 
> Jon
> 
> --
> ***** Scanned by Anti-Spam Sheriff *****
> 
> 
> 
IMPORTANT: Notice to be read with this E-mail 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check them for 
viruses and defects.  2. This e-mail (including any 
attachments) may contain confidential information for the 
use of the intended recipient.  3. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please: contact the sender by return
e-mail, to notify the misdirection; do not copy, print,
re-transmit, store or act in reliance on this e-mail; and 
delete and destroy all copies of this e-mail.  4. Any views 
expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not 
a statement of Australian Government policy unless otherwise stated. 
5. Finally, please do not remove this notice, so that any 
other readers are aware of these restrictions.






  • Prev by Date: Re: Graser beam observations
  • Next by Date: Re: Graser beam observations

  • Previous by thread: Re: Graser beam observations
  • Next by thread: RE: Graser beam observations

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Apr 01 01:09:04 GMT 2004