GZG List archives -- March 2004

Number 534 of 940 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: UNSC Thrust line was: Stealth and Fighters





I think the ones that trigger this thought were some of the larger
models like FT1109, FT1110, FT1111, FT1113 and FT1114.

Chris Downes-Ward

-----Original Message-----

> I like the ship designs to, but I like the UNSC ships because they
don't
> seem to have been designed with their plane of gravity at 90 degrees
to
> their plane of thrust like the NAC ships.

Yes, decks at 90 degrees to the line of thrust is definitely a
configuration you rarely see in SF spaceships - or for that matter, in
the Space Shuttle.

However, I find it interesting that you see the UNSC ships as having 
decks perpendicular to thrust. Of course, internal configuration is not
visible, but to me, their long, narrow shape hints more at decks running
 along the ship.

Greetings
Karl Heinz







**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************







  • Prev by Date: UNSC Thrust line was: Stealth and Fighters
  • Next by Date: RE: FT fire arcs

  • Previous by thread: UNSC Thrust line was: Stealth and Fighters
  • Next by thread: variable hulls

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Apr 01 01:09:04 GMT 2004