GZG List archives -- March 2004

Number 531 of 940 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: Stealth and Fighters




There was a reason that I put quotes around the word attack, maybe
critique would have been a better work. I was actually more interested
in the stealth rationale, it seems at odds with GDW's Star Cruisers idea
that stealth is everything approach but fit better with Full Thrust
where everything's on the table to start with. I can't really comment on
the accuracy of either approach.

I like the ship designs to, but I like the UNSC ships because they don't
seem to have been designed with their plane of gravity at 90 degrees to
their plane of thrust like the NAC ships.

Chris Downes-Ward



**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************







  • Prev by Date: Re: Stealth and Fighters
  • Next by Date: [LST] Attack Vector: Tactical RE: Stealth and Fighters

  • Previous by thread: Re: Stealth and Fighters
  • Next by thread: [LST] Attack Vector: Tactical RE: Stealth and Fighters

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Apr 01 01:09:04 GMT 2004