GZG List archives -- March 2004

Number 420 of 940 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Rant Warning below



I've always assumed that the Omega class "Destroyer" was named in the 
same spirit as the British light carriers were called "through-deck 
cruisers" to get the naval estimates through parliament.

Roger Burton West wrote:

>On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 08:08:46AM -0600, Doug Evans wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Natch, in B5, where the largest ship the
>>humans have is a 'destroyer', it's obvious, you can get away with fudge.
>>    
>>
>
>My understanding is that Straczynski and Ellison intended to use naval 
>terms, but didn't actually know them well enough to use them correctly 
>and didn't bother to hire an advisor.
>
>Roger
>
>
>  
>

-- 
We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.

http://www.cs.umb.edu/jfklibrary/j091262.htm




  • Prev by Date: Re: Rant Warning below Re: UNSC beta and FB3
  • Next by Date: Re: Rant Warning below

  • Previous by thread: Re: Rant Warning below
  • Next by thread: Re: Rant Warning below

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Apr 01 01:09:02 GMT 2004