GZG List archives -- March 2004

Number 402 of 940 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Fighters and Hangers



> The main complaints are that we would like a treatment where there can
> be (minimum options): a large, multi-group, variable-size (# of groups)
> "hanger area" in the interior of the ship treated as a protected system
> and an exposed "launch and recovery area" of variable size. 

Two parts to this -- variable size and protected system.

For variable size, you could try Fighter Bay = 3 Mass + 1 Mass per 
fighter.  The base 3 mass could be construed as separate tracking and 
control facilities, combat air traffic controllers, etc.  This is 
totally un-playtested, but at least it would discourage 
1-fighter-per-group cheese.

Not sure what the "protected system" is worth.  Normally I'd guess it's 
worth about 25% of the points cost, but that's not necessarily 
applicable for fighters--ie if 50% of my fighters die, how much is it 
worth to have rearm/refuel cpacity for 100% of them instead of, say, 86% 
after a threshold?

And you should also have some kind of discount to reflect the chance 
that your landing/launching tube works but your hangers are dead, or 
vice versa.





  • Prev by Date: Genericity of grasers (was Re: UNSC beta and FB3)
  • Next by Date: Re: European Religioins was: California/Texas secession

  • Previous by thread: Re: Fighters and Hangers
  • Next by thread: Re: Fighters and Hangers

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Apr 01 01:09:02 GMT 2004