GZG List archives -- March 2004

Number 401 of 940 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Genericity of grasers (was Re: UNSC beta and FB3)



On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 09:52:00PM +0000, agoodall@att.net wrote:

>This is an industry site, not a sci-fi site. It sounds as though "graser" is as generic a term as "laser".

It is.

The only setting I'm aware of which has non-bomb-pumped grasers is Honor
Harrington.

But I think Jared's point is that even "laser" is a lot more specific
than "beam battery", and I think it's a fair one. I play Full Thrust
mostly in the GZG universe, but not everyone wants to do that...

One could level a similar claim at anti-matter torpedoes; who's to say
that the _standard_ missiles don't use anti-matter, in the universe
someone's trying to emulate with Full Thrust?

Roger




  • Prev by Date: Re: UNSC beta and FB3
  • Next by Date: Re: Fighters and Hangers

  • Previous by thread: Re: UNSC beta and FB3
  • Next by thread: Re: Genericity of grasers (was Re: UNSC beta and FB3)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Apr 01 01:09:02 GMT 2004