Re: CPV?

[Jared Hilal <jlhilal@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@telia.com> wrote: 
> The "full" version treats carriers, freighters etc. differently,

So I can assume (or hope) that a TMF 200 bulk cargo freighter will no
longer have the same value as a FB battlecruiser?

One other thing (if it's already taken care of then just ig nore this);

on 28 Jan 2004, Laserlight wrote:

"Matt [Tope] said:
>Think I will steal the Hattin outright, (well, I'll drop 2 pds and 2 
>points of armour to bring the hull up to 26,

I think you'll find the armor is more valuable than the extra hull."

in
http://lists.firedrake.org/gzg/200401/msg00373.html

If he is correct (and I can see that he is), then shouldn't armor cost
more points than hull integrity, and they are currently the same?

J