GZG List archives -- March 2004

Number 190 of 940 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: CPV?



Randall Joiner wrote:

>Ok, I've seen CPV mentioned several times, and am guessing that this is 
>a/the new point system for FT?

"A", yes. "The"... well, that remains to be seen but it looks likely <g>

("CPV" for "Combat Points Value", to emphasise that it refers to the ship's 
combat potential and *not* to how much it costs in background universe 
money to build it :-/ )

>Where can I get a copy?

Here :-/

Basically what you do is replace the "Basic hull cost" of 1xTMF by 
TMFxTMF/100, rounded to the nearest integer (recent minor modification: 
"but never to less than 1 point", similar to the rounding rules for engine 
etc. Mass ratings).

The "full" version treats carriers, freighters etc. differently, but the 
above formula covers all non-carrier warships... and since the carrier etc. 
bits are tied to some of the stuff playtested at ECC7 and are still subject 
to change at short notice, I won't go further into those bits at the moment.

Later,

Oerjan
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry





  • Prev by Date: Re: Fighters and Hangers
  • Next by Date: FT to WW2 conversion

  • Previous by thread: CPV?
  • Next by thread: Re: CPV?

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Apr 01 01:09:00 GMT 2004