GZG List Archives -- August 1998

Number 44 of 967 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: Simple is good



You wrote: 

>Heh! I'm sure we're all in agreeance that rules should be the 
>province of lawyers, and gaming the province of gamers. I'd guess 
>that we'd mostly all 'rule as needed' where the rules don't fit. Most 
>of us might try to get what we think of as the right flavour. I like 

>and painful arguments between those so inclined (I'd rather just 
>clear the room with a cannister of CS myself). The only difference 

I simply play with adults who can have a reasoned discussion for a few 
minutes, then agree on which modification or houserule most closely 
resembles what we'd expect from our experiences and reading.  Then we 
get on with the game.  I refuse to game with disagreeable people.  My 
feeling is that I deal with assholes at work, why should I do so in my 
free time?  That's why I no longer play WWII games.  If it's not fun 
for all involved, screw it.  And arguing over rules vis playing the 
game isn't fun for me.

John M. Atkinson



  • Prev by Date: Re: SG: Close Assault Combat and armour
  • Next by Date: Fighter/ Bombers for FT...

  • Previous by thread: RE: Simple is good
  • Next by thread: SJ Orges in DSII

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Sep 12 14:55:35 GMT 2002