Re: [FT] Reopening the fighter balance can of worms

>textfilter: chose text/plain from a multipart/alternative
>
>On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Roger Burton West
<roger@firedrake.org>wrote:
>
>>
>>  That's certainly the approach I take. Points balance works a lot
better
>>  if you use CPV rather than NPV (i.e. adjusted for hull size), but
that's
>>  true of FT2.5 anyway.
>>
>>
>I plan to use CPV instead of NPV.
>
>Which brings up another question. I seem to remember there was another
>weapon system that had a point imbalance problem, but I can't remember
>which one it was. I think it was scatterguns? Or was it submunition
packs?
>
>--
>Allan Goodall		  http://www.hyperbear.com
>awgoodall@gmail.com
>agoodall@hyperbear.com

Hi Allan - good to hear you have someone near you who wants to get 
into FT - now of course you may be planning to do this already, but 
my suggestion would be that you start him off with a couple of games 
of FT LIGHT before getting into the complexities of 
FT2/2.5/2-point-whatever-draft-you-choose....

Once you have him hooked with the light version, then start showing 
him the other stuff!

Jon (GZG)