Re: Discussion topic - rewriting (future) history....?

Amen on the needed work, but I'd have to disagree about the importance
of
the fluff. It tends to be the major driver in anything new on the
market,
including new versions.

The_Beast

Jerry Han <jhan@warpfish.com> wrote on 10/20/2011 10:14:23 AM:

***snippage***

> My thought is, any time you spend considering the backstory canon
would
> probably be better spent working on minis or co-coordinating with new
> rulesets.  In the end, we didn't play FT because of backstory (though
it's
> always nice to have) - we played FT because, it had good and fast
rules
> and nice looking miniatures.	I don't think revising the backstory
> will generate much, if anything in the way of new business, and will
> risk alienating anybody who feels the 'backstory' has become less
> 'realistic' by the changes.
>
> JGH