Prev: Re: Space Geography Next: Re: Space Geography

Re: Space Geography

From: Roger Burton West <roger@f...>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:50:52 +0100
Subject: Re: Space Geography

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 05:48:00AM -0400, Indy wrote:
>But note that in general the background radiation is
>pretty low to begin with. On the flip side, contemporary technology has
>challenges just detecting Earth-crossing asteroids. It's pretty much
all
>passive and optical.

Part of the problem when it comes to spaceship detection is that they
aren't relatively cool planets - in a world with realistic physics, a
ship with enough power plant to run a space-drive and weapons and so on
is seriously glowing, and will be obvious to anyone with an IR detector
at several AU range. (Ask Ken Burnside about this...)

R

Prev: Re: Space Geography Next: Re: Space Geography