Re: [GZG] Gzg-l Digest, Vol 37, Issue 24

>On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:20:42PM +0100, Ground Zero Games wrote:
>
>>If folks bring ordnance-heavy ships and want them at fully supplied
>>at the start of the game, make them pay for suitable fleet munitions
>>tenders as part of their force; if they choose NOT to do this, then
>>all ordnance-carrying ships have only a random % of their standard
>>loadouts to represent ordnance already expended in earlier
>>engagements....?
>
>Fixed 50% rather than random? Otherwise the game could be won or lost
on
>that one die roll. :-)

I was thinking of a separate roll per ship, which should even out 
(though you could be lucky or unlucky when you roll for that FSE SDN, 
I agree....). But yes, a fixed % could work too.

I'm looking at ways of encouraging balanced fleet design without 
actually enforcing it.

Jon (GZG)

>
>R
>_______________________________________________
>Gzg-l mailing list
>Gzg-l@mail.csua.berkeley.edu
>http://mail.csua.berkeley.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@mail.csua.berkeley.edu
http://mail.csua.berkeley.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l