Re: [GZG] a peek from FT3 on fighters/ordnance (was: Re:

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@mail.csua.berkeley.edu
http://mail.csua.berkeley.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lThat sounds
like good news.  

________________________________
From: Indy <indy.kochte@gmail.com>
To: gzg-l@mail.csua.berkeley.edu
Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 7:29:56 AM
Subject: Re: [GZG] a peek from FT3 on fighters/ordnance (was: Re:

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Tom B <kaladorn@gmail.com> wrote:

Follow up questions for Indy:
> 
>If you want some testing, should it include:
> 
>Fighter Morale
>Any form of Fighter Endurance (and if so, what variety/rules?)

Fighter Morale is optional. If one tests with it, please outline which
flavor of the morale used.

Fighter Endurance is also optional. We have not been using it, as we
found it adds voluminous layers of bookkeeping as you have more and more
fighter squadrons on the board. Also, when we have used it, we have
found that either fighters accomplish their mission with CEF to spare or
die.

Thanks!
Mk