Prev: Re: [GZG] Missile technologies - was Monster ships Next: Re: [GZG] Monster ships

Re: [GZG] Monster ships

From: Charles Lee <xarcht@y...>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:35:24 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [GZG] Monster ships

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@mail.csua.berkeley.edu
http://mail.csua.berkeley.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l1. As to MT
missles dying 50% to Anti-air defences is like sayin lets use a 50
caliber machine gun to kill a inbound Scud. Ain't a real set of odds.
The MT missles were smart and bigger than a fiter.
2. They use fighter kill rolls on salvo verses whats in the book.
--- On Tue, 1/12/10, Oerjan Ariander <orjan.ariander1@comhem.se> wrote:

From: Oerjan Ariander <orjan.ariander1@comhem.se>
Subject: Re: [GZG] Monster ships
To: gzg-l@mail.csua.berkeley.edu
Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 2:44 PM

Charles Lee wrote:

> MT missles were like the mass distruction weapons in FB1 - FB2.

They wouldn't have been quite so much so if you had used the actual FB1
rules for them instead of the MT rules...

> I think the fact I'm throwin a 2 mass missle at you and 4+ kills it
without even sweatin, dispite the fact I can't use the PDAF to shoot at
a ship.

You're using pre-FB1 systems again. The FT2 PDAF could not damage ships;
the FB1 PDS OTOH *can* do so. Not as well as a beam battery, but
still...

> I like the rules in More Thrust stating all defensive fire requires 6+
to kill it.

Using house rules is fine, of course - but please be aware that you
*are* using house rules. Stating things like "the reality is that system
X works like THIS" when you are in fact talking about your group's house
rules easily leads to misunderstandings, since that "reality" doesn't
apply to anyone using other rules (like eg. the published ones).

> Also most people use a modified roll against salvo missles making them
even stronger.

That's interesting, for the only SM modification I've seen described by
more than one group is to allow PD overkills to count against the next
incoming salvo instead of being wasted - but that makes the SMs
*weaker*, not stronger... What modification are you thinking of here,
that makes the *SMs* stronger?

Regards,

Oerjan

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@mail.csua.berkeley.edu
http://mail.csua.berkeley.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l



Prev: Re: [GZG] Missile technologies - was Monster ships Next: Re: [GZG] Monster ships