Re: [GZG] Mixed Role Fighters

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

I think you got my drift. I'm not math guy and the formula was more for
demonstration purposes rather than accuracy. Yes, most expensive role
should be A with all additional roles added at a discounted cost. 

-Eli 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ryan Fisk" <ryan.fisk@gmail.com> 
To: gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu 
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 1:55:19 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: Re: [GZG] Mixed Role Fighters 

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:26 PM,  <emu2020@comcast.net> wrote: 

> This is where point systems need to show finness. Instead of A+B=X,
these 
> multiple role fighters should come down to A+B(c)=X where "c" is a
modifier, 
> making the second role cheaper than it would be if it was the sole
role of 
> the fighter. This would reflect that the fighter has extra
capabilities, but 
> that the limitations on the fighters' ability to act within the rules 
> hampers those extra capabilities. 

And where A would be the most "expensive" role, in the end we are 
discussing whether c is a value above or below 1.  I say it has to be 
below 1 or the point system totally fails. 

But essentially I agree. 

-- 
Ryan Fisk 

_______________________________________________ 
Gzg-l mailing list 
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu 
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l