Prev: Re: [GZG] Question: small-arms tech and troop quality.... Next: Re: [GZG] Question: small-arms tech and troop quality....

Re: [GZG] Question: small-arms tech and troop quality....

From: "John Atkinson" <johnmatkinson@g...>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:41:52 -0600
Subject: Re: [GZG] Question: small-arms tech and troop quality....

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Michael Llaneza
<maserati@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>
> On Dec 13, 2008, at 5:37 PM, John Atkinson wrote:
>>> Jon is discussing tactical implications of small arms.  You're
asking
>> political and strategic questions.  The outcome of every single
>> firefight in Vietnam was favorable to the United States--but in the
>> long run, that wasn't the relevant question.  Or rather, it wasn't
>> relevant enough.

> Ok, now I want to see a GZG strategic game with all the soft factors
> the rest of the genre avoids.

Sure thing.  And the second Jon can find customers who are enthralled
by the idea of doing SWEAT-MS assessments, he'll put in the effort to
write the rules.

John
-- 
"Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again
and again.  We're looking for thousands of Persians."
--Vita Aureliani

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: Re: [GZG] Question: small-arms tech and troop quality.... Next: Re: [GZG] Question: small-arms tech and troop quality....