Prev: Re: [GZG] [FT] Royals in the NAC Next: Re: [GZG] [FT] Royals in the NAC

Re: [GZG] [FT] Royals in the NAC

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:26:55 -0600
Subject: Re: [GZG] [FT] Royals in the NAC

As a public service to the hard of understanding, would someone please
explain this supposition?

James Butler wrote on 11/17/2008 05:21:38 PM:

> Does this mean that Japan and Britain are enemies in the Full Thrust
> universe? :)
>
> James!
>
>
> --- On Sun, 11/16/08, John Brewer <jbrewer@webtv.net> wrote:
>
> > From: John Brewer <jbrewer@webtv.net>
> > Subject: [GZG]  [FT] Royals in the NAC
> > To: gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
> > Date: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 4:40 PM
> > A partial list of members of the extended Royal Family
> > serving in the NAC military...
> >
> > Commander, Ark Royal Carrier Battlegroup - HRH Prince
> > Schneizel, Duke of York.
> >
> > Commander, Enterprise Carrier Battlegroup - HRH Princess
> > Cornelia, Duchess of Kent ( legendary CAG, "Cornelia
> > the Witch").
> >
> > Commander, Independence Carrier Battlegroup - Princess
> > Consort Marianne Hasting Lamperouge, Duchess of Gloucester,
> > Countess of Huntingdon (legendary CAG, "Marianne the
> > Flash").
> >

I dunno, Don, but could Ryan's comment have been ironic? It does seem to
fly in the face of an IJN that seems rather good of defending itself.
However, I'll wait on the answer to my question above...

I think there may be a subtle genre reference I'm missing.

Don M wrote on 11/17/2008 08:17:54 PM:

> No. The Japanese territory is jealously defended by the NAC.
>
> Ryan,
> Is that a fact? Where is that written up?
>
> Don

For the record, I'm perfectly happy to leave India's status
undetermined.

The_Beast

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: Re: [GZG] [FT] Royals in the NAC Next: Re: [GZG] [FT] Royals in the NAC