Re: [GZG] Slightly OT - Hypothetical weapon question
From: Oerjan Ariander <orjan.ariander1@c...>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:32:35 +0100
Subject: Re: [GZG] Slightly OT - Hypothetical weapon question
John Atkinson wrote:
> >>"Gosh, I thought it was a directional explosion. . . "
> >>
> >>Something like that? Hehehe. . .
> >
> >Sometimes I get that impression, yes... though I wouldn't laugh about
it if
> >I were you :-/
>
>It's only funny because most of the folks who kill themselves off in
>this manner will be Infantrymen, [...]
It might be funny if the persons demanding those insanely-short minimum
arming distances were the same ones who will actually, personally use
the
weapons in question. If that were the case, they'd really only have
themselves to blame when they get a fin assembly stuck in the forehead.
Unfortunately, the people making those demands *aren't* the end users of
the product, and thus will never personally have to suffer the effects
of
their demands >:-(
/Oerjan
orjan.ariander1@comhem.se
"Life is like a sewer.
What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l