Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS
From: "Robert Mayberry" <robert.mayberry@g...>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:14:20 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS
John, what's your view of an IED-like device designed for use by a
professional army? Would it be any better/different from a
conventional anti-vehicle mine? By "army" I don't necessarily mean
technologically advanced, but definitely organized and equipped for a
conventional war. From your description, it doesn't sound like it has
any value unless you're a guerilla with lots of imported explosives,
and even then is pretty counterable.
On 7/16/08, John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's what most people in this conversation aren't tracking. As much
> as you want to put together scenarios that approach or incorporate
> elements of real-world situations, they make shitty games. Sorry.
> Your average IED incident lasts moments, and rarely incoporates
> anything more than a device and possibly a few secondary devices. If
> small arms fire is encountered as part of the attack, you're talking a
> handful of jackasses blazing away with unaimed fire from a building
> far enough away that it can't be positively identified. It's over in
> less than a minute, because if they stick around, they end up very,
> very dead. We've been killing lots of insurgents for five years, and
> most of the ones who want to die for Allah already have. The rest are
> linking up with cells capable of putting them behind the wheel of a
> car loaded with explosives to drive into an Iraqi Police Station or a
> market full of women and kids.
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l