Prev: Re: [GZG] theoretical rules schedule? (was Re: And now for something completely different...) Next: Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS

Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS

From: "Richard Bell" <rlbell.nsuid@g...>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:01:42 -0600
Subject: Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lOn
Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Tom B <kaladorn@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I'm not sure if mines use any sort of self-forging penetrator, but if
they
> do, GEV fans are at risk. If they use an EMP pulse as a payload, GEVs
and
> Grav vehicles may be at risk. Some sort of anti-grav field mine may
also be
> feasible (lord knows, in ST the warp drive was always overloading or
feeding
> back or something).
>
> The scary thing about a grav-pulse mine that damages/destroys the
drive of
a grav vehicle is that effect goes right through any armor, as if it was
not
there.	Any protection scheme that could block the effect also blocks
the
effect of the drive.


Prev: Re: [GZG] theoretical rules schedule? (was Re: And now for something completely different...) Next: Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS