Prev: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces? Next: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

Re: [GZG] What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

From: emu2020@c...
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:36:11 +0000
Subject: Re: [GZG] What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_25988_1216046171_2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_25988_1216046171_2--
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lWer
en't the Russians doing something similar to produce an APC with better
survivability than the BMP/BTR?

-Eli

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Damond Walker" <damosan@gmail.com> 

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Don M <dmaddox1@hot.rr.com> wrote:

Damo

Well considering that the Israelis had done the same thing with captured
T55s
years before:
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/vehicles/armored_personnel_carrie
rs/achzarit/Achzarit.html

Sure.  That's old news -- just didn't know if other folks on the list
knew the concept was spreading to other nations.

Damo

Prev: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces? Next: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?