Prev: Re: [GZG] What are the pitfalls of standardised forces? Next: Re: [GZG] What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

Re: [GZG] What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

From: "Damond Walker" <damosan@g...>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:32:44 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lOn
Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Tony Wilkinson <twilko@ozemail.com.au>
wrote:

>
> Take a look at the Namer
>
>
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/vehicles/armored_personnel_carrie
rs/namera/Namera.htm
>
>
Russia is building the same type of thing though on the older T-55 hulls
(of
which I'm sure they have bajillions of them).

Link: http://www.military-today.com/apc/btr_t.htm

And in Jordan...  Link: http://www.military-today.com/apc/temsah.htm

I'm sure others will follow.

Damo


Prev: Re: [GZG] What are the pitfalls of standardised forces? Next: Re: [GZG] What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?