Re: [GZG] GW and Re: Artillery considerations

Oerjan Ariander wrote:
> For GW, that's pretty bold - even *hinting* that scratch-built models
might 
> be OK... 'Course, it helps that E:A is a "Specialist Game" (*) rather
than 
> one of GW's core games :-/
>
> (*) or at least was. It seems that Specialist Games is currently being

> folded into GW proper again :-(
>   
E:A is good - I have a playtest credit in it, the way I do for FBs 1&2 -

but I think E40k is better. Jervis is a good designer, and this is his 
best work.

Epic is not obtainable via GW here in Oz. Can't even mail order it, 
except from the UK. The one time I tried this, they shipped double the 
quantity I asked for, charging accordingly, and of the wrong type.

Zoe

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l