Prev: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if? Next: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

From: "Ryan GIll" <rmgill@m...>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:49:00 -0500
Subject: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

Remote devices sound a bit like FCS which hopefully will be scaled back
from the grandeous plans which have been put forwards so far.

I do like the idea of remote piloted vehicles for certain roles. UAVs
are certainly handy. Smart remote weapons platforms that can randomly
patrol routes could be handy too, at least as sort of a moblie semi
smart minefield.

The weapons from aliens, the sentry guns were certainly a good concept
but good for fixed defense. But then for small infantry forces fixed
defenses that cannoy redeploy to secondary firing positions are limited. 

--
Ryan Gill
sent from my treo

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if? Next: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?