Re: [GZG] Opposed roll randomness (Was: [SG3]: What if?)
From: Stephen Scothern <stephen.scothern@G...>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:24:56 +0000
Subject: Re: [GZG] Opposed roll randomness (Was: [SG3]: What if?)
Samuel Penn wrote:
<snip>
> However, what I don't like is that if the d12 rolls badly, then a bad
> roll on the d6 can still beat it.
<snip>
> It's when the greens roll a 2 and still win that
> it seems wrong.
>
<snip>
Yes, but there is only a 1/72 chance of this happening.
Does it really seem that wrong that the chance of a wild shot from a
green to hit an elite that happens to have tripped/stumbled the wrong
way is about 1.3%?
How much lower would you like this number to be?
Cheers,
Steve
________________________________________________________________________
____________________________
This email (and any attachments) is private and confidential, and is
intended solely for the
addressee. If you have received this communication in error please
remove it and inform us via
telephone or email. Although we take all possible steps to ensure mail
and attachments
are free from malicious content, malware and viruses, we cannot accept
any responsibility
whatsoever for any changes to content outwith our administrative bounds.
The views represented
within this mail are solely the view of the author and do not reflect
the views of the organisation
as a whole.
________________________________________________________________________
____________________________
Graham Technology plc
Registered in Scotland company no. SC143434
Registered Office India of Inchinnan, Renfrewshire, Scotland PA4 9LH
http://www.grahamtechnology.com
________________________________________________________________________
____________________________
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l