Prev: Re: [GZG] [Aliens] was Re: FMA at EEC etc Next: Re: [GZG] [Aliens] was Re: FMA at EEC etc

Re: [GZG] [Aliens] was Re: FMA at EEC etc

From: "Allan Goodall" <agoodall@h...>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:41:34 -0600
Subject: Re: [GZG] [Aliens] was Re: FMA at EEC etc

On 3/1/07, Oerjan Ariander <oerjan.ariander@rixmail.se> wrote:
>
> The *ship* models, yes (though some of the comments seen on this list
> recently would suggest that not all players agree!)... but what
published
> GZG rules would you say support the various manga-style figures, not
to
> mention the GC range?

I see your point. I was just pointing out that there are FT players
who buy the ships because they look cool, and a lack of SSDs doesn't
hurt them because they can create their own ship designs using FT.

I think this goes back to a question we had years ago asking "who uses
FB ships".

Your point is made, though. There are ships of a certain distinct
nature whose distinct nature isn't found in the rulebook.

> >It would be interesting, though, to find out who is buying FT ships
> >for games other than FT...
>
> Starmada players, Power Projection players, B5 Wars players, players
of
> various other space combat games...

I meant that it would be interesting to have a breakdown in the number
of players purchasing the ships for games other than FT. I could guess
which games they were using them with... *S*

-- 
Allan Goodall		 http://www.hyperbear.com
agoodall@hyperbear.com
awgoodall@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] [Aliens] was Re: FMA at EEC etc Next: Re: [GZG] [Aliens] was Re: FMA at EEC etc