Prev: Re: [GZG] ping Next: Re: [GZG] ping

Re: [GZG] ping

From: Charles Lee <xarcht@y...>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:35:20 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [GZG] ping

Sonar passive does'n hear "holes in the water".
Hollywood loves either giving way too much bonus or
way too many negatives to basic technologies of late
last century (1980-1999).

--- Roger Burton West <roger@firedrake.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:23:38PM +0000, Phillip
> Atcliffe wrote:
> >Mike Stanczyk wrote:
> >>On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Roger Burton West wrote:
> >>>Just make sure you don't make the same error as
> the designers of the Ohio SSBN.
> >>Sorry I've not heard that one.  Please retell or
> provide web reference...
> >Is this as in "it's _too_ quiet -- so quiet that it
> can be detected by the 'hole' it makes in the
> background noise level"?
> 
> That's the version I've heard. If anyone can provide
> corroboration
> (positive or negative) I'd like to know...
> 
> R
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
>
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
> 

 
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] ping Next: Re: [GZG] ping