Prev: Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers Next: Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers

Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers

From: "Roger Books" <roger.books@g...>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:56:46 -0500
Subject: Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lTry playing FSE
against someone that maintains speed and dodges often and
you
will understand, especially if they keep small ships tucked in close to
their big guys.

And even without all of that try:
http://www.jumpspace.net/Wargames/Buehler/Turn0.html

At the end point he was combat effective enough that I was seriously
concerned.  That
after significant SM hits.

Roger

On 12/26/06, john tailby <John_Tailby@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>
>
> Seen the FSE...
> their ships are sped 6 and have long range missile attacks. They can
> maintain the range against most opponents and hammer them with
missiles
> and
> in a turning game they can get behind their opponent (esp. in
cinematic)
> and
> close in for a beam kill.
>
> Given the light PDS suites of the FB ships I can't see why the FSE
don't
> rule fleet engagements.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>


Prev: Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers Next: Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers