Prev: Re: [GZG] [Stargrunt] Wanted Next: [GZG] re: Wanted

[GZG] RE: [FT] Unified Fighter Rules? [sec=UNCLASSIFIED]

From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:36:09 +1100
Subject: [GZG] RE: [FT] Unified Fighter Rules? [sec=UNCLASSIFIED]

As stinger nodes follow the beam die mechanic, they should be able to. 
This
is one of the cases where those optimised Sa'vasku designs will suffer
from
the lack of extra pds.

Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/

> -----Original Message-----
 On Behalf Of john tailby
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [FT] Unified Fighter Rules? Re: Re: [GZG] Re:  
> Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)
> 
> You do not list stinger nodes as anti ship able to attack 
> ordinance is this deliberate or did it get left out in error?

IMPORTANT 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information 
   for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, 
   please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
not 
   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
publications 
   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
messages. 
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe
emails

   of this type from DVA. 
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.  

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] [Stargrunt] Wanted Next: [GZG] re: Wanted