Prev: Re: [GZG] Re: Re: SSDs for Shengfeng and Zhukov Next: Re: [GZG] Re: Re: SSDs for Shengfeng and Zhukov

Re: [GZG] Re: Re: SSDs for Shengfeng and Zhukov

From: "Roger Books" <roger.books@g...>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:32:25 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] Re: Re: SSDs for Shengfeng and Zhukov

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lThey look noce but
would be better if they were round.   I have some
rotationally
challenged gamers.  With a round base you mark the placement of the tick
on
the the base with a fingernail on the table.  Rotate until the next tick
matches.
Hexes are hard to do  odd number of point tyrns.

Roger

On 8/11/06, Doug Evans <devans@nebraska.edu> wrote:
>
> I think the old bases were between 25-35mm, roughly inch to inch and a
> half, so on the order of twice as wide.
>
> The CMD remakes were pretty thick, as well. Now, if I'm viewing the
> piccies
> at the store right, aren't the new bases hexes rather than circles?
I'm a
> bit less happy about that.
>
> The_Beast
>
> Roger wrote on 08/11/2006 09:02:01 AM:
>
> > How do they compare to the old Geo-Hex Metal bases?
> >
> > Roger
>
> > On 8/11/06, McCarthy, Tom (xwave) <Tom.McCarthy@xwave.com > wrote:
> > > Well, we are now supplying all the very big ships (old AND new
> > > sculpts) with the new 50mm all-metal hex base and stand,
> > which should
> > > make them a lot stronger and more stable.
> >
> > That they do, very much so.  The new NAC SDN, while very
> > heavy, is also
> > very stable on the new base.  The new base is also low,
> > broad and flat
> > enough for smaller ship bases to partially overlap it
> > without problems.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>


Prev: Re: [GZG] Re: Re: SSDs for Shengfeng and Zhukov Next: Re: [GZG] Re: Re: SSDs for Shengfeng and Zhukov