Prev: Re: Re: Re: [FT] Alternate Tuffleyverse interpretations (Long?) was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup Next: Re: Re: Re: [FT] Alternate Tuffleyverse interpretations (Long?) was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup

Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC News - Comments and Ideas requested

From: "Grant A. Ladue" <ladue@c...>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:31:35 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC News - Comments and Ideas requested


   For the life of me, I can't remember or find the message that John is

 replying to here.  Was there some "asking for comments" message about
ECC that
 I missed?

   grant

> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have to agree with what I've mostly heard so far.
> 
> 1) A single room is great.
> 2) The Brunswick kind of sucks, but I don't come for the hotel room.
> 3) Good food within short walking distance.
> 4) The Brunswick restaurant sucks.
> 5) The costs and price per attendee is good, but yes, I too would
>    pay more to attend.
> 6) I would also waive my $5 GM kickback if it would help.
>    And yes, I'd still run games.  I don't run them for the $5.
> 
> Now, that all said, I would also like to give a little bit of a vendor

> perspective.	My first ECC was number 7, and that year and each since,
I've 
> (with my girlfriend Yerin) run the Decals Express table.  DE does not
make 
> enough profit at the cons to do more than happily justify our showing
up, 
> but it's fine.  I like bringing the decals to the show.
> 
> One of the things that I really like is that this is a much more
intimate 
> con than others that I've attended (Historicon, Cold Wars, Origins). 
I can 
> actually walk away from the vendor table and do not have to worry that

> someone is going to walk away with anything.	Given that there are 
> typically around 50 people, and IMHO GOOD people, I can go look at a
game, 
> look at minis, or even go play.  This is an incredible perk.	I also
love 
> the fact that all of the games are happening in the same room that the

> table is in.	At ECC 9, Grant LaDue called me away as a "warm body" to
play 
> in an FT game run by Carl Shue (likely mis-spelled, sorry Carl!). 
Could I 
> have done that at Origins?  Not bloody likely.
> 
> Despite the pain that Jon has to deal with every year (and yes, I do
feel 
> for the man!), I think that moving to a more expensive, and possibly 
> multi-roomed location would harm the ECC.
> 
> I would not opposed at all if Jon were able to find a similar (price
and 
> meeting room-wise) location in another town near Lancaster.  Someone
else 
> mentioned a bunch of possibilities.  If the Brunswick doesn't get
better, 
> that might be a viable option.
> 
> There.  Vendor opinion delivered.
> 
> I'll get the pics that Jon (St. Jon) sent of the new vehicles up
tomorrow 
> when I'm back in front of my work machine.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John Lerchey
> Decals Express
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
> 

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: Re: Re: [FT] Alternate Tuffleyverse interpretations (Long?) was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup Next: Re: Re: Re: [FT] Alternate Tuffleyverse interpretations (Long?) was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup