Prev: Re: Re: Please ignore previous on Knights... Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup Next: Fwd: Flag Decals (was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup)

Re:[GZG] [FT] Tactical jump

From: Noam Izenberg <noam.izenberg@j...>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 14:38:51 -0400
Subject: Re:[GZG] [FT] Tactical jump

I definitely like this. Good rationale for low start speeds across a  
face-to-face table.

Perhaps a start of game initiative phase to determine setup:
1) Roll dice, reroll ties, loser choses "deployment point" somewhere  
on the table. Winner chooses second.
2) Roll dice again, winner chooses whether their force is "arriving"  
or "in place". Loser is the opposite. In case of ties, both sides are  
"arriving".
3) Roll dice, reroll ties for determinig ship placement. Players  
alternate placing ships on the board. Ships "in place" stay where  
they're put. "Arriving" ships have some misjump possibility - half or  
less than that of standard FTL arrival. Ships that arrive but are  
displaced off the board are out of play.

Start speed for the game is up to 1xMD for any given ship.

Horrible Gaze'n Apeman	 (Noam Raphael Izenberg - yes, I'm lookin' at  
_you_)

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: Re: Please ignore previous on Knights... Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup Next: Fwd: Flag Decals (was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup)