Prev: Re: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 26 Next: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 30

Re: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 26

From: Oerjan Ariander <oerjan.ariander@t...>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:02:12 +0100
Subject: Re: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 26

John Tailby wrote:

>The Slammer universe seems odd if big LOS rule because that leads into
why 
>are none LOS weapons not used?

Non-LOS weapons *are* used occasionally - that's one of the reasons why
the 
Slammers have Calliope area-defence vehicles to shoot down any incoming 
artillery shells before they can do any damage.

>Self guided smart munitions give a big stand off capability without the

>LOS weapons being able to retaliate.

Only if the smart munitions get a chance to attack anything before
they're 
destroyed by LOS area-defence weapons...

Regards,

Oerjan
oerjan.ariander@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 26 Next: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 30