Re: [GZG] FT 2+FB rules questions

>OA wrote on 03/05/2006 11:55:32 PM:
>
>>  David Stokes worte:
>***snip***
>>  >Core Systems: If a core system like life support has been
>>  hit and is
>>  >scheduled to go out in some number of turns, does it take
>>  threshold checks
>>  >again at further thresholds?
>>
>>  Good question. AFAIK the rules don't specify this
>>  (normally you don't make
>>  threshold checks for damaged systems), but I'd say yes.
>>
>>  >If so, how is it handled? Do you roll again for how
>>  number of turns?
>>
>>  Again, I'd say yes.
>
>I guess I assumed no because I didn't see otherwise; OA's suggestion
does
>make more sense. However, while there's always the very thin PSB that
>further damage might 'shake things into place', I'd suggest that any
>further rolls only shorten, not lengthen, the time.

As a "semi-official" answer - at least until we decide how to confirm 
it for FT3 - I'd say that you can take your pick between three 
options (ie: agree this as a house rule between all your players 
before the next game):

1) Don't check again, first time-to-failure stands.

2) roll again, but only take the new result if it shortens the time 
to failure. Ignore it if you get the same time or longer than 
previously.

3) Second failed threshold means immediate total failure (remaining 
emergency systems knocked out).

Jon (GZG)

>
>Actually, a second roll for threshold result should probably be
'immediate
>system failure unless a d20 roll less than remaining turns, which
result
>then becomes remaining turns'.
>
>Wait! When would a vacchead have anything other than d6's? ;->=
>
>That said, a second chance for a core threshold check has to be a VERY
rare
>occurance, right?
>
>The_Beast
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gzg-l mailing list
>Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
>http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l